Utterly perverse Neighbourhood CIL decision from Haringey's cabinet

You may remember the recent consultation by Haringey on Neighbourhood Community Infrastructure Levy.

Haringey consulted over whether to abandon the neighbourhood approach to neighbourhood CIL, and replace it with a Borough approach to neighbourhood CIL - ie. to scrap the 85% sent to Haringey rule in favour of 100%.

The result of the consultation was -
  •  "8.3   During the five-week consultation period, 86 responses were received. 27 responses (31.4%) supported the draft amendments, 50 responses (58.1%) opposed the draft amendments and 9 responses (10.5%) did not indicate a clear for or against position."
So, they've decided to go ahead and do it anyway despite cogent arguments against.
Of the 7 council areas, Noel Park and Harringay lose the most from a £1.2m allocation to net of £255k. Everyone else gets more than the original allocation (Hornsey goes from £144K to £184K). 

Views: 85

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This is disgusting. As someone who participated in the consultation, I also received an email about it. I was quite annoyed and sent a long, somewhat rambling response. I did not get a reply. 

What is the council playing at? Noel Park needs that money.

More proof that there’s no such thing as democracy on the local level in the UK.


New Member Zone

If you've just joined Noel Park net, visit our New Member Zone for ideas on how to get the most out of the site. 

promote your business here

If you run a local business we're a low-cost way to access local residents. Contact the moderators at NoelPark.net@gmail.com for more info

Support our site

This is a volunteer-run community project. If you'd like to help us cover our costs so we can continue to provide this community service, please consider making a donation here.

© 2021   Created by Rachella Sinclair.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service